911 AMATEUR part2
Uploaded by: simonshack
Video Description:
If someone asks you to see a video of the WTC exploding with no plane in it, here's your best choice.
The Naudet footage is maybe the most diffused of all the 9/11 images so there is no possible question in regard to its "authenticity" - so to speak....as it is forged.
My analysis here has consisted - as usual - in slowing down the video, check it frame by frame and occasionally crop (enlarge) some shots to view the fine details. (As ever, I have of course NOT altered one single pixel of the material ). I wasn't able to perform this analysis earlier as the 4 versions I had of this famous footage were not as good resolution as this 5th version I recently found.
The graphic object diving into the tower appears to be transparent : I call it 'THE GLASS PLANE'. It really is a crass graphic insertion. No video compression will make a block of pixels change color entirely depending on the background it is cast against. But more, much more importantly :
MAIN EVIDENCE OF MISSING AIRPLANE :
We may observe that the visible right side ( not covered by 1st explosion dust) of the tower remains intact until 6 seconds after impact . Indeed, as much as 30% of the wall is still intact - AFTER the 1st impact. At the 6sec mark we see shape charges igniting and eventually ripping open the wide plane-shaped hole we all remember.
As the explosive charges only manage to open a 130ft-wide gash, a problem arises for the 911 hoax planners : a Boeing 767's wingspan is 156 feet. So, to fix this problem, the far right tip of the gash (representing 'plane's wingtip') gets penciled in digitally on the video to reach the 160ft gash-width required to 'sell' the idea of a Boeing767 melting entirely into WTC 1.
NOTE TO SKEPTICS : No, that black gash appearing suddenly is NOT smoke - it appears too quickly and develops in opposite wind direction.
The inescapable conclusion is that NO LARGE PASSENGER JET (a missile's most likely - as at the Pentagon...) crashed into the WTC1 or - for that matter - WTC2 (see SEPTEMBER CLUES).
On a final note, if this most publicized and widespread 9/11 video has been THIS sloppily forged, there probably were whistleblowers within the forgery crew - or else that crew was quite simply inept.
In my honest opinion, the plane / no plane debate is now over. Let's move on and see how this evidence can be brought to a court of law.
911 AMATEUR part1 :
http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=qbYAV5fCGiM &fmt=6
911 AMATEUR part3 :
http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=vI3ZpLuz3ts &fmt=6
If you want more info on how the 9/11 TV fakery was carried out, please watch:
SEPTEMBER CLUES (part1-9+EPILOGUE)
http://www.livevideo.com/socialservice
Tags for this video: 9/11 911 binladen bush cheney clinton fakery giuliani hoax naudet no nyfd planes romney terror thompson tv war wtc1
Find more videos in the "Education" category
See more videos uploaded by simonshack
| 911 Amateur Part 2 by simonshack | 1st CNN Airing of the 'Bush Saw it at his Limo' WTC1 Naudet | 9/11 NWO Fake (3rd ed): Eye Witness or Not? pt.2/3 |
 |  |  |
| 9/11: WTC North Tower plane crash | 911 AMATEUR part 2 | 911 AMATEUR part2 |
 |  |  |
Share This Video:
Comments for this video: Show || Hide
Tell a friend:
The hole was caused when the damage the plane was doing caused that part of the wall to collapse, as I've already explained.
Now you answer my question; if this was a government cover-up, and they edited the film, and the hole was a necessary part of the cover-up, how could they be so incompetent as to not edit the whole film, including the part between the first and second explosion?
That gash was caused after the crash by the wall collapsing.
2) They (gov) dont care if some few ppl find out anything. Why should they take you serious?
Btw. the question is nothing more than rhetoric, it doesnt proove anything. Are you seriously arguing, a government could never do a crime and if they'd do noone could catch them anyway? If so, you better buy a history book. Governments DID crime in every age of human kind. Why not now?
I knew this was inside job, the same day it happened and I saw the towers collapse.
For too many reasons I can even count.. And yet people still belive this, because they are TOLD to. Sad really.
Even if say the explosive workers sisn't know at the time what was going on how did they ALL keep quite afterwards? You think at least ONE would have come forward, no?! Waddya u think?
and watch "911 Witnesses Holmgren..."
It's one possible theory to some of your questions.
watch?v=CE3lPxadzNI