Search Tags:

Categories:

Hannity & Colmes 05-16-07 Part 1



Uploaded by: bmoullas
Video Description:
hannity and colmes discuss opie and anthony with curtis sliwa and jackie clark


Tags for this video: anthony clark colmes curtis discuss hannity jackie opie sliwa xm

Find more videos in the "News" category
See more videos uploaded by bmoullas

Related Videos
THE GUARDIAN ANGELS IN LACurtis Sliwa at Forham Roadi cancel my xm account
the-guardian-angels-in-la.htmlthe-guardian-angels-in-la.htmlthe-guardian-angels-in-la.html
Opie & Anthony: The Real Controversy O and A rallyOpie and Anthony suspended...
the-guardian-angels-in-la.htmlthe-guardian-angels-in-la.htmlthe-guardian-angels-in-la.html


Share This Video:       StumbleUpon       del.icio.us       Reddit       digg       Furl       Spurl       Simpy       YahooMyWeb


Comments for this video: Show || Hide
Comments for this video on YouTube
Words Bad... ... ( 1 year ago by VisionVentures)
Words Bad... Violence Good! great message for all up incoming socialist
Curtis shut the ... ( 1 year ago by luckylynch)
Curtis shut the fuck up your a jealous fucking douchebag go fuck yourself you faggot how the fuck did this asshole get on the air why why why dont give this guy a minute and by the way curtis opie or anthony would kick your fucking old ass back to italy
Sliwa is a fucking ... ( 1 year ago by meclymer52)
Sliwa is a fucking useless cunt. Jackie Clarke schooled him in every aspect of that arguement. Even Hannity & Colmes AGREE ON THE ISSUE.
XM did the ... ( 1 year ago by Crimsonking29)
XM did the suspending. Not CBS. Get the facts straight before arguing about it.
Array ( 1 year ago by Crimsonking29)
Why suspend O&A for doing what they are paid to do: Be shocking and controversial. It's a XL channel that warns they will hear explicit languange.
Yeah I did not know ... ( 1 year ago by miknarf)
Yeah I did not know much about the story but as long as the government is not punishing O & P my point still stands. XM also has every right to control what content their service provides. It has nothing to do with constitutional free speech.
STOP GETTING ... ( 1 year ago by joeyboombatz68)
STOP GETTING OFFENDED RETARDS!!didnt you ever hear the saying "Sticks and stones may break my bones, but words will never hurt me". It does'nt matter what the sunject is, it;s going to offend somebody. That guinea-wanna-be-tough-guy Curtis Silwa along with the rest of America should just keep your mouths shut. Go back to reading your PEOPLE and US WEEKLY magazines and just die already of cancer<<
- did that offend anybody.good I hope it did..assholes.
FFRRRRRUUUNKKUSSSS! ... ( 1 year ago by joeyboombatz68)
FFRRRRRUUUNKKUSSSS!!!!!
Curtis as a person ... ( 1 year ago by applechunk)
Curtis as a person who condemns violence and is into empowering the community This time you have lost the plot I thought Journos could deliver a complelling argument? Instead you was lead down the aisle like a yapping dog and put out to show
Sean Hannity ... ( 1 year ago by raymond67554)
Sean Hannity advocates turning the dial instead of banning it. Curtis Sliwa wants fascism. Oh and what Opie and Anthony said was retarded and they said it for attention. The way they said it and the way they acted, it was stupid. It wasn't made as a threat, it was just a bunch of idiots screwing around. I don't care for Anthony and Opie and I don't care for the women in question either. FREE SPEECH!
That chic schooled ... ( 1 year ago by jrsnowden25)
That chic schooled Curtis when he made the comment about hitting O & A. Great stuff.
why is that dude ... ( 10 months ago by plpfctn2007)
why is that dude dressed like little red riding hood?
Colmes wanted to ... ( 8 months ago by CurtSliwa)
Colmes wanted to suck my cock. I told him I'd let him suck it if he promised me he wouldn't bite it, or at least not hard anyways...
Jackie Clarke is so ... ( 6 months ago by asarkees)
Jackie Clarke is so classy. Flossy, and classy.
Of course the Jew ... ( 5 months ago by heituzi)
Of course the Jew and the woman are anti-justice, because it might look bad. I'd hate to see how that woman mothers her child, what kind of a monster she raises.
with all do respect ... ( 4 months ago by Johnnydmb23)
with all do respect, when someone stands for the rights to choose how you please, and to reap the consequences of one's action. They are in no way advocating it, or saying they admire it as a way of life. For you to say she is going to raise a monster is despicable when you do not understand her morals.
It's very easy to ... ( 4 months ago by heituzi)
It's very easy to see how single mothers tend to raise brats. It's because they have little or no sense of justice. It might not be pretty to beat up a rapist, but that would a way of taking care of business, maintaining order in society - and that's something we need to do, weather it looks good or not. I don't see females or Jews doing much work in this area.
A rapist should ... ( 4 months ago by Johnnydmb23)
A rapist should punished, and punished much more than they usually are. However raping someone is an act against another human being. Free-Speech is a completely different subject, and neither of these men raped anyone. I am part hebrew btw and while many jews tend to be liberal it is very wrong of you to pigeon whole women, gays, jews, blacks, whomever into any catagory. We are all individuals.
however to do so i ... ( 4 months ago by Johnnydmb23)
however to do so i may add is your right :)
We are both ... ( 4 months ago by heituzi)
We are both individuals and members of groups. It is OK to generalize that Jews are liberal, because that is the general fact. It is OK to generalize that women lack a sense of justice, because that is the general situation (if you observe single mother households it's very apparent). That you may be Jewish AND conservative is certainly possible (though even the conservative Jews like like in the zionist and pro-war PNAC may be merely a new form of communist).
The only right we ... ( 4 months ago by heituzi)
The only right we have is to behave in a responsible and respectable manner. I expect this of myself and of everyone I know.
We have three ... ( 4 months ago by Johnnydmb23)
We have three rights, those are of Life, Liberty, and property. We are a people that seek for ourselves, and any successful goverment (ours being one of them) is based on this principle of individuality and egoism. Goverment's job is to merely protect those 3 rights of man, as stated by #1 Reason, and #2 our constitution. If you neglect reason and natural law you will fail, but the goverment (as shown in history) cannot or should not coerce people on the individual level. In other words
people are free to ... ( 4 months ago by Johnnydmb23)
people are free to choose to do wrong, and free to do right. A goverment's job is NOT to bail them out when they choose unwisely, but to secure law that makes that individual safe, but DOES NOT tell what one to do. Making drugs illegal, guns, etc just allows the criminals to run a monopoly, and make more money contrary to legalizing and having it become corporate, leading to less crime, less profit, less money going into the system from all sides period. Also your
You see if there is ... ( 4 months ago by Johnnydmb23)
You see if there is no welfare state, people cannot simply choose to sit home and blow there brains on drugs, because they will not create the revenue to do so (via corporate dealing, and no goverment spending). People will have to be responsible to be successful, that or lucky... but as we all know luck is any form of goverment,



Tell a friend:


URL 
Embed Code