Advertise Here

Sigma DP1



Uploaded by: Sollozza
Video Description:
Toma de contacto en la PMA 2007 de Las Vegas con la DP1 y el visor externo VF-11.


Tags for this video: 2007 contacto de DP1 foveon hands-on PMA quesabesde Sigma toma

Find more videos in the "Entertainment" category
See more videos uploaded by Sollozza

Related Videos
Sigma DP1Leica M8 The bestSigma DP1 review
sigma-dp1.htmlsigma-dp1.htmlsigma-dp1.html
Richo GX100　キャップの改造Ricoh GR Digital 2The Imaging Resource at PMA 2007: Sigma DP1 Rangefinder
sigma-dp1.htmlsigma-dp1.htmlsigma-dp1.html


Share This Video:       StumbleUpon       del.icio.us       Reddit       digg       Furl       Spurl       Simpy       YahooMyWeb


Comments for this video: Show || Hide
Comments for this video on YouTube
It's another Lumix ( 8 months ago by zeophoto)
It's another Lumix
Although they've ... ( 8 months ago by zeophoto)
Although they've finally gotten close with this one, they always do something like that, and cannot ever add up all the right stuff including but not limited to fast lenses. They'll say of course, that you can compensate with onboard software but why!? Make them right the first time and built loyalty and apreciation from a market base.
agree .. and stop ... ( 8 months ago by basslinegenerator)
agree .. and stop making retractable lenses on a fixed lense camera ... thats sick !!
To " ... ( 8 months ago by SETAGAYAN)
To "basslinegenerator":
The DP1 lens is f1.4 i.e. way better than f2.0
The DP1 camera is a jewel of pure genius. I am not afflated with the manufacturer or any sales outlet. I just ordered one from Yodobashi Camera here in Tokyo. They have a back-order list several weeks, and possibly months long even though cameras keep on being delivered to the store in groups every week.
Cheers!
Sorry, I made a ... ( 8 months ago by SETAGAYAN)
Sorry, I made a mistake saying the DP1 lens is f1.4. Seems like "basslinegenerator" was right; it is indeed f4
I stand by my purchase order and positive comments about this camera anyway, although I wish that lens really would have been f1.4 as I thought it was ;-)
you know nothing, ... ( 8 months ago by a20010494)
you know nothing, boy.
I'm real impressed ... ( 8 months ago by zeophoto)
I'm real impressed with you and you're Okefenokee talk. They're all the same and you may spend a lot of money before ever understanding that.
f4...that's too ... ( 7 months ago by urbandiscount)
f4...that's too slow...ridiculous.
feels like leica ( 7 months ago by BBnose)
feels like leica
"agree .. and stop ... ( 7 months ago by SaganAppreciationSoc)
"agree .. and stop making retractable lenses on a fixed lense camera ... thats sick !!"
Why is that?
It's about time ... ( 7 months ago by SaganAppreciationSoc)
It's about time that somebody got the idea to leave out the SLR mechanism but have other desirable traits. But it needs to support optical zoom, and other lenses as an option would be nice for some people. Above all i'm glad they give the audience enough credit to realize that an SLR mech doesn't get you anything in a digital system (beside shake, delay, and usually no live-preview).
but you DO know ... ( 7 months ago by basslinegenerator)
but you DO know that the sigma has a dslr sized sensor, which is appr 8x bigger than the sensor in the lumix ... dont you ?
because ... it has ... ( 7 months ago by basslinegenerator)
because ... it has no zoom-range, the lense is backfocusing, so there would be no moving parts, the lense itself could be much sturdier, it could be made from aluminium, not plastic to make it light, so the retraction takes lesser power. if its a zoom lens it has to be made in at least two parts anyway, but if its fixed, why not make it out of sturdy one piece aluminium?
OK, if you talk ... ( 7 months ago by holuncheung)
OK, if you talk about fixed 28mm, my old Ricoh GR1 is f/2.8 (assuming dSLR sensor you mean something close to 135 format). How come this one is bulkier and is only f/4?
the larger the ... ( 7 months ago by tgrupert)
the larger the sensor the shallower the depth of field. because your GR1 digital has a small sensor it';s effective aperture compared to this camera is actually more smaller.
if this lens was ... ( 6 months ago by dmc3)
if this lens was f2.8 or f3.5 it would be much, much larger and the camera woul dno longer compact. The clean ISO's make up for it
what's the use of ... ( 6 months ago by urbandiscount)
what's the use of having a large size sensor if a slow lens means I am restricted in manipulating DOF?
I don't have this ... ( 5 months ago by eieui)
I don't have this camera and don't even intent to buy it, but have you seeing the pictures it makes? Go to flick and take a look...
Simply amazing!
Thats why they call ... ( 5 months ago by HideoRamin)
Thats why they call it a poor mans M8 :P
"poor man's m8". ... ( 5 months ago by jamescapewell)
"poor man's m8". ha. that's very snotty. who calls it that? the dp1 is indeed aimed at a different user/(niche) market to the m8 (hence the more than notable difference in price), but the m8 is a completely different instrument altogether. for instance: try carrying an m8 in to your trouser pocket. why compare the two?
No zoom huh. Would ... ( 4 months ago by miniheli)
No zoom huh. Would be terible to take it on a safari trip in Africa to take up close shots at lions lol. Thats how I would die. But I love this camera, I dont have it but what do I know im just starting this photography thing gonna go to photography school soon. But it looks cool! I love the classy but yet not to old look of it. I just wished it had a optical zoom.
you love this ... ( 3 months ago by bizarrius)
you love this camera only for the lens it has, nothing else...
Not only cause of ... ( 3 months ago by miniheli)
Not only cause of the sensor. besides its not even 14.6 megapixal its divaided by the 3 primary colors so it only gives off like 4 or something effective megapixels. I just like it cause it looks cool
Another Leica ... ( 3 weeks ago by ibimw)
Another Leica wannabe... No P & S camera is worth a crap.



Tell a friend:


URL 
Embed Code 


Advertise Here