Evolution and God are compatible Part II- Ken Miller



Uploaded by: DonExodus2
Video Description:
Stop making people "choose" between evolution and God. This is EXACTLY what fanatical Christians want you to do.
Miller explains.


Tags for this video: Christianity compatible creationism design dishonesty Evolution god intelligent religion strategy wedge

Find more videos in the "News" category
See more videos uploaded by DonExodus2

Related Videos
Evolution - What about God? 2of6Evolution - What about God? 3of6Evolution - What about God? 6of6
evolution-what-about-god-2of6.htmlevolution-what-about-god-2of6.htmlevolution-what-about-god-2of6.html
Evolution - What about God? 4of6Evolution - What about God? 5of6Evolution for ID-iots
evolution-what-about-god-2of6.htmlevolution-what-about-god-2of6.htmlevolution-what-about-god-2of6.html


Share This Video:       StumbleUpon       del.icio.us       Reddit       digg       Furl       Spurl       Simpy       YahooMyWeb


Comments for this video: Show || Hide
Comments for this video on YouTube
would you mind ... ( 6 months ago by pnx031)
would you mind offer me those evidence? Because really... it's not like I want to not believe in god, doesn't make me friends or anything. :)
The quote at the ... ( 6 months ago by jebus6kryst)
The quote at the end is classic.
non intervening ... ( 6 months ago by pnx031)
non intervening period.
I don't buy the notion that we are teh supreme being. We are not. if you are humancentric then you should recheck things. No god didn't intervene at all or just started everything. you can't have both.
Evolution starts and finishes without a god. so does your conscience. now about the universe nothing is certain but if someone started something like that and just walked off i wouldn't care at all to believe in such being.
lol. IRONY. ( 5 months ago by DonExodus2)
lol. IRONY.
Look up "Scientific ... ( 5 months ago by FandensOldemoder)
Look up "Scientific theory" on e.g. NAS or Wikipedia and understand.
Array ( 5 months ago by FandensOldemoder)
Yes, he did.
What do you think of the "Theory of gravity" - after all, it is only a theory, never proved.
You have to take it on faith - expect to fly real soon now!
(Evolution) is a ... ( 5 months ago by Scotchpker)
(Evolution) is a general postulate to which all theories, all hypotheses,
all systems must henceforward bow
and which they must satisfy in order to be thinkable and true.
Evolution is a light which illuminates all facts,
a trajectory which all lines of thought must follow —
this is what evolution is.
~Pierre Teilhard de Chardin
looks like pure faith to me.
although this quote makes me think its more religious extremism.
I guess that string ... ( 5 months ago by TuesdayPillow)
I guess that string of lines quoted from Chardin is the definitive "proof". A theory in science is not the same as a theory in the "human" world.
Thus why evolution ... ( 5 months ago by Scotchpker)
Thus why evolution is not accepted by the majority of scientists but by only the majority of atheists.
"Thus why evolution ... ( 5 months ago by fffanatic06)
"Thus why evolution is not accepted by the majority of scientists but by only the majority of atheists"
you, sir, are deluded. Forgive me but how anyone can look at evolution and all the evidence provided for it and call it faith is beyond me. Unless of course that person is deluded. Also, on that quote you provided, I'd like you to define postulate. I just wanna see how knowledgeable you are of the words you are using.
scotchpoker - ... ( 5 months ago by fffanatic06)
scotchpoker - provide a definition for faith and then explain how evolution fits into it. And if you can't don't bother replying.
Faith - The belief ... ( 5 months ago by Scotchpker)
Faith - The belief of something without full knowledge of it or how it works.
Evolution: The theory in which we all originate from a general ancestor.
Where is your proof?
Becuase you can't provide me with anything but the !IDEA! that a mutation randomly creates new species you are enacting your faith by beliving it.
And I would like to see any proof you have you would be the first to show some real evidence, infact if you did I know several organizations that are handing out cash.
1. to ask, demand, ... ( 5 months ago by Scotchpker)
1. to ask, demand, or claim.
2. to claim or assume the existence or truth of, esp. as a basis for reasoning or arguing.
3. to assume without proof, or as self-evident; take for granted.
4. Mathematics, Logic. to assume as a postulate.
I bow to no other man, nor his ideas.
Why should I bow down to this guys BELIEFS?
Oh boy, are you a ... ( 4 months ago by Albinoceros)
Oh boy, are you a crazy.
Your proof is in the transitional forms in the fossil record, and it is in the strata layer. Your proof is in vestigal traits and deformaties. Your proof is in the fact that inbred animals are more vulnerable to diseases than animals with mixed genes. Your proof is in the lack of any animals which have bird and mammal features.
And gravity is still just a theory. When Newton proposed it he didn't understand how it all worked. Learn the scientific method.
And yet we still ... ( 4 months ago by Scotchpker)
And yet we still dont understand gravity... hmmm it would appear to me that as many people float around in india it isn't quite the law that we crack it up to be.
Get real we just don't know, there are no transitional fossils or all the young earth creationists would be locked up
you leg is not vestigial just because you can live without it.
Its Pseudo-scienence garb wrappen in dead fish... makes me sick...
Your leg still has ... ( 4 months ago by Albinoceros)
Your leg still has many uses and your life will radically change for the worse without it even if you're still alive. Wisdom teeth are actually a detriment to many individuals.
Also no, the Young Earthers wouldn't be locked up because in America you're allowed to spew whatever crazy shit you want, Freedom of Speech. There are many, many transitional fossils. You just refuse to acknowledge them because they don't fit into your worldview. Look up this guy's vids.
I remember uniting ... ( 3 months ago by MusicalAdrian)
I remember uniting creation and evolution in my head as a young kid over a decade ago. It's hard for me to understand that people can't understand, at least, HOW this kind of thinking could exist.
Trying to prove ... ( 3 months ago by highwind8124)
Trying to prove evolution and Christianity are compatible is going to be impossible. First off, evolutionists believe that birds evolved from the dinosaurs, whereas the Bible says birds were created before reptiles (beasts that walk).
As well, we've got a ton of quotes from Christians explicitly stating why evolution and Christianity are incompatible, and they've made a far more compelling case then Ken Miller simply shrugging it off.
Genesis isnt ... ( 3 months ago by DonExodus2)
Genesis isnt literal.
The Pope seems to think theyre theologically compatible, but what does he know :)
Just wondering, do ... ( 3 months ago by elan2000)
Just wondering, do you think that part of the Bible is not just poetry, but actually just plain wrong?
The biggest incompatibility I see is evolution vs Adam and Eve. If there's no A&E, there's no original sin, and that contradicts quite a bit.
Array ( 3 months ago by hugesinker)
Don,
These compatibility videos are excellent. However, given your own brief descriptions of your faith here, I have to ask. Have you looked into Deism? If you believe in God as a source of objective morality and ordered natural systems in the universe... but see the bible and organized religions are getting it wrong and doing more harm than good, I'd love to welcome you over to my world.
The question of God's existence is largely irrelevant. Time to ask about the nature of God is.
i agree. I maintain ... ( 2 months ago by tarkana613)
i agree. I maintain my judaism mainly as a cultural identity, but my beliefs have formed to be more deism. I believe organized religion (not religion on its own) is counter to free thought. I find this concept of G-d too personified and claimed to be quite active while it would seem now that if there is a g-d, he is a passive g-d. and as has been said, if he is all knowing and all powerful, then with his infinite foresight he easily could have made the processes of nature knowing the outcome.
Well, I do not ... ( 2 months ago by ubi2002)
Well, I do not think evolution comes in conflict with Adam and Eve. This is because we are humans because God put souls in us. Adam and Eve could have been the ones who first received souls.
lies lies lies ... ( 3 hours ago by happerz)
lies lies lies deciving false philosophy's wrong false lies lies lies...



Tell a friend:


URL 
Embed Code