The Birth Of A Nation 3/20 (1915)



Uploaded by: hollywoodclassics
Video Description:
Two brothers, Phil and Ted Stoneman, visit their friends in Piedmont, South Carolina: the family Cameron. This friendship is affected by the Civil War, as the Stonemans and the Camerons must join up opposite armies. The consequences of the War in their lives are shown in connection to major historical events, like the development of the Civil War itself, Lincoln's assassination, and the birth of the Ku Klux Klan.
A controversial, explicitly racist, but landmark American film masterpiece.
The domestic melodrama/epic originally premiered with the title The Clansman in February, 1915 in Los Angeles, California, but three months later was retitled with the present title at its world premiere in New York, to emphasize the birthing process of the US. The film was based on former North Carolina Baptist minister Rev. Thomas Dixon Jr.'s anti-black, 1905 bigoted melodramatic staged play, The Clansman.
Its release set up a major censorship battle over its vicious, extremist depiction of African Americans, although Griffith naively claimed that he wasn't racist at the time. Unbelievably, the film is still used today as a recruitment piece for Klan membership - and in fact, the organization experienced a revival and membership peak in the decade immediately following its initial release. And the film stirred new controversy when it was voted into the National Film Registry in 1993, and when it was voted one of the "Top 100 American Films" (at # 44) by the American Film Institute in 1998.
Film scholars agree, however, that it is the single most important and key film of all time in American movie history - it contains many new cinematic innovations and refinements, technical effects and artistic advancements. It had a formative influence on future films and has had a recognized impact on film history and the development of film as art. In addition, at almost three hours in length, it was the longest film to date. However, it still provokes conflicting views about its message.
The subject matter of the film caused immediate criticism by the newly-created National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) for its racist and "vicious" portrayal of blacks, its proclamation of miscegenation, its pro-Klan stance, and its endorsement of slavery. As a result, two scenes were cut (a love scene between Reconstructionist Senator and his mulatto mistress, and a fight scene). But the film continued to be renounced as "the meanest vilification of the Negro race." Riots broke out in major cities (Boston, Philadelphia, among others), and it was denied release in many other places (Chicago, Ohio, Denver, Pittsburgh, St. Louis, and Minneapolis, eight states in total). Subsequent lawsuits and picketing tailed the film for years when it was re-released (in 1924, 1931, and 1938).
The resulting controversy only helped to fuel the film's box-office appeal, and it became a major hit. Even President Woodrow Wilson during a private screening at the White House is reported to have enthusiastically exclaimed: "It's like writing history with lightning. And my only regret is that it is all terribly true." To his credit, Griffith later (by 1921) released a shortened, re-edited version of the film without references to the KKK.
This is a film which every movie buff really does need to see, for two reasons. 1) It shows how far the movie making process has come, and gives us all a way to truly appreciate some of the other early films, and how far the moviemaking technology advanced between 1915 and the 1930's. and 2) It also allows us the chance to appreciate just how conflicted our society has always been, not just today. Many of the other reviewers have labeled this film as racist garbage, but it truly does represent one group's view of society at the time, and gives us a great way to understand some of the driving factors behind the race relations problems we would have later. In particular, during the Civil Rights battles that would take place during the 1950's and 60's in the deep South.
Part 4 - http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=D0BVuByPALY
Watch all my channels:
http://youtube.com/hollywoodclassics
http://youtube.com/classicanimation
http://youtube.com/dancefrenzy
http://youtube.com/classicdocumentaries
http://youtube.com/vintagecommercials
http://youtube.com/classicsoundbox
http://youtube.com/videomiscellany


Tags for this video: Alden B. Cooper D.W. Gish Griffith Henry Lewis Lillian Mae Marsh Mary Miriam Ralph Walthall

Find more videos in the "Film" category
See more videos uploaded by hollywoodclassics

Related Videos
DW GRIFFITH JUDITH OF BETHULIA 1913The Birth Of A Nation 1/20 (1915)The Birth Of A Nation 2/20 (1915)
dw-griffith-judith-of-bethulia-1913.htmldw-griffith-judith-of-bethulia-1913.htmldw-griffith-judith-of-bethulia-1913.html
The Birth Of A Nation 5/20 (1915)The Birth Of A Nation 4/20 (1915)The Birth Of A Nation 6/20 (1915) Re-Uploaded
dw-griffith-judith-of-bethulia-1913.htmldw-griffith-judith-of-bethulia-1913.htmldw-griffith-judith-of-bethulia-1913.html


Share This Video:       StumbleUpon       del.icio.us       Reddit       digg       Furl       Spurl       Simpy       YahooMyWeb


Comments for this video: Show || Hide
Comments for this video on YouTube
I think he (DW ... ( 5 months ago by rpmsxtreme)
I think he (DW Griffith) was inspired by his maid in this scene, lol.
this movie is so ... ( 4 months ago by FatherMcKenize)
this movie is so damn confusing. if only there was DIALOGUE
FriendlyFlirts _ ... ( 3 months ago by naminep)
FriendlyFlirts _ COM Join -> Make Freinds -> Be happY! eftfphrm zwhyqkunfy
Is she supposed to ... ( 3 months ago by USCol)
Is she supposed to be black?
She's supposed to ... ( 3 months ago by greenami)
She's supposed to be a mix, but a lot of the 'black' people in this film don't seem to be authentic. What's with the guy at the end of part 2/20, during the slave quarter jig scene? It looked like a white guy wearing a mask.
According to ... ( 3 months ago by USCol)
According to Wikipedia, the main black character was played by a white man in blackface. (I haven't seen the whole movie, just stumbled upon it.) She doesn't even look half believable even as a mix.
True dat! Thanks ... ( 3 months ago by greenami)
True dat! Thanks for the Wikipedia tid-bit!
Yeah only a few ... ( 2 months ago by corinthian129)
Yeah only a few black people in this movie are actually blacks, most with meaningful roles are whites in blackface. Blacks weren't trusted to act in 1915 apparently. The "tragic mulatto" (a mixed woman) appears a lot in pre-1960s film... the single drop of black blood was excepted by audiences as a valid plot device for her being a flawed and tragic character.
america of that ... ( 1 month ago by tybash)
america of that time is africa of now
I'm a Southerner ... ( 1 month ago by Rubystars1000)
I'm a Southerner but I like how Lincoln is portrayed as so dignified in this film. The actor did a wonderful job.



Tell a friend:


URL 
Embed Code