Atheist Newdow PWNs Fox News' Cavuto over Huckabee Cross Ad?
Uploaded by: LiberalViewer
Video Description:
As nice as it was to see Fox News host Neil Cavuto even question the recent political ad from Republican presidential candidate Mike Huckabee in which the image of a cross floats behind the head of the former Baptist Minister as he talks about Jesus, I quickly found it was all just an opportunity to invite on atheist Michael Newdow and strawman Newdow's arguments. In these clips from the December 18 Fox News broadcast, I show how Michael Newdow PWNs Neil Cavuto as Cavuto shows his bias by attacking Newdow and failing to address Newdow's argument.
And, speaking of bias, this video is another of DOZENS of examples you can find on my Fox News Bias playlist at: http://www.youtube.com/view_play_list?p=A3BD2524FE99BD4D
Tags for this video: atheism cavuto christian commercial cross Fox huckabee michael neil newdow News political religion strawman world your
Find more videos in the "News" category
See more videos uploaded by LiberalViewer
Comments for this video: Show || Hide
Tell a friend:














I never said all of the founding fathers were deists, but "MANY." Even those that did happen to ascribe to a religion agreed that the U.S. government was to be secular, as evidenced by the Declaration of Independence and the friggin' Constitution.
There were many non-Christian presidents. Being a theist does not immediately denote a belief in Jesus Christ.
Jefferson is the proof of that. Along with many others.
Separation of Church and State...end of story.
A deist believes in god. While, to some, maybe an umbrella term, contextually speaking it refers to the fact that Jefferson believed in a higher power, a god if that's what you wish to call it, but not Jesus Christ. Through extension, of course, obviously nothing to do with the bible.
It IS incredibly wrong because you don't understand deism and Jefferson.
I'll gladly provide some links to letters of Jefferson denouncing christ if you wish.
religion is a part of who he is, and thus what we are voting for- why should he not be able to profer what he is?