Atheist Newdow PWNs Fox News' Cavuto over Huckabee Cross Ad?



Uploaded by: LiberalViewer
Video Description:
As nice as it was to see Fox News host Neil Cavuto even question the recent political ad from Republican presidential candidate Mike Huckabee in which the image of a cross floats behind the head of the former Baptist Minister as he talks about Jesus, I quickly found it was all just an opportunity to invite on atheist Michael Newdow and strawman Newdow's arguments. In these clips from the December 18 Fox News broadcast, I show how Michael Newdow PWNs Neil Cavuto as Cavuto shows his bias by attacking Newdow and failing to address Newdow's argument.
And, speaking of bias, this video is another of DOZENS of examples you can find on my Fox News Bias playlist at: http://www.youtube.com/view_play_list?p=A3BD2524FE99BD4D


Tags for this video: atheism cavuto christian commercial cross Fox huckabee michael neil newdow News political religion strawman world your

Find more videos in the "News" category
See more videos uploaded by LiberalViewer

Related Videos
Fox News Interviews Atheist Brian FlemmingFox news examines atheism with Bill O'Reilly pt 1Fox news examines atheism with Bill O'Reilly pt 2
fox-news-interviews-atheist-brian-flemming.htmlfox-news-interviews-atheist-brian-flemming.htmlfox-news-interviews-atheist-brian-flemming.html
Growing Atheist Movement in AmericaChristopher Hitchens on Hannity & Colmes about Rev. Falwell's Death FOX News John Gibson's Blasphemy Challenge
fox-news-interviews-atheist-brian-flemming.htmlfox-news-interviews-atheist-brian-flemming.htmlfox-news-interviews-atheist-brian-flemming.html


Share This Video:       StumbleUpon       del.icio.us       Reddit       digg       Furl       Spurl       Simpy       YahooMyWeb


Comments for this video: Show || Hide
Comments for this video on YouTube
Proof? try reading ... ( 1 month ago by jarret45)
Proof? try reading a book, son. You can start with the Age of Reason by Thomas Paine. How about Jefferson's Bible? Maybe the writings of Benjamin Franklin?
I never said all of the founding fathers were deists, but "MANY." Even those that did happen to ascribe to a religion agreed that the U.S. government was to be secular, as evidenced by the Declaration of Independence and the friggin' Constitution.
fox news got PWNed ... ( 1 month ago by boschy)
fox news got PWNed like always
no, I don't think ... ( 1 month ago by andydeee)
no, I don't think he was wrong to use religious symbolism to get ahead in politics. But if you're stupid enough to fall for for it it'd say a lot about you.
most of our ... ( 1 month ago by revolution55125)
most of our founding fathers were deists, although it wasn't like atheism it was agnostic
he was running for ... ( 1 month ago by revolution55125)
he was running for office at the time, this came out the same time he was making his bid as a presidential candidate, i myself think its stupid to get mad about something like this but he WAS using for politics
I see, then maybe ... ( 1 month ago by iwebber88)
I see, then maybe it was wrong. I don't think he was using it for anything, at least it doesn't appear that way, but to each his own. Never liked Huckabee, so I never followed him.
Read what the ... ( 1 month ago by thesepipesRclean)
Read what the founding fathers say about christians "not fit for office of any kind " George Washington . "Of diminished intellectual capacity " Thomas Jefferson . Madison "religion has no place in an office of the State " Since the beggining of our nation we were warned of the danger posed by religious ignorants . Lets listen to our founding fathers and vote all Christians out of office !!
oh...there is a way ... ( 1 month ago by deeliciousplum)
oh...there is a way to address the importance of separating church from state. Yet, due to the large numbers of pro-church/state ideologists...this will be a tuff battle. Role models are a major form of subverting the subtle consciousnesses of the vulnerable populace. If the general public do not regard their power of free choice as being important, then no matter what the antithesis folkies of church/state do...the battle is of no use. I am sad to say.
All people have the ... ( 1 month ago by deeliciousplum)
All people have the right to access the religion of their choice. All those who have no need for religion should be given the same respect and admiration. Yet, when a governing body is to be held accountable for making the right decisions at the right time...what would be in the best interest of the public is a person who can put aside their ties to (non)religious beliefs and work towards communal understandings and respect.
Also - Cavuto was ... ( 4 weeks ago by AustralianStallion90)
Also - Cavuto was incredibly wrong.
There were many non-Christian presidents. Being a theist does not immediately denote a belief in Jesus Christ.
Jefferson is the proof of that. Along with many others.
yes it does ( 4 weeks ago by lss64)
yes it does
Excellent (and ... ( 3 weeks ago by TangoBinAlsheed)
Excellent (and accurate) description.
I feel that it was ... ( 3 weeks ago by comawhite45)
I feel that it was wrong...simply because there are people that will ingnore what their plans are and vote simply because 'Oh he's Christian like me so I should vote for him.'
Separation of Church and State...end of story.
Non-"christian", ... ( 3 weeks ago by newwavewitch)
Non-"christian", sure... but the stretch is only be millimeters. Jefferson and a lot of his contemporaries were what we now call deists, where they believe in God and the Bible, but aren't afraid to challenge it and don't exclude other beliefs as possibilities... benefit of the doubt kind of stuff. Aside from that, what else was there? multiple denominations of Christianity (and Kennedy (who was Catholic)? That doesn't sound "incredibly wrong" to me.
See, there is where ... ( 3 weeks ago by AustralianStallion90)
See, there is where you again have it wrong.
A deist believes in god. While, to some, maybe an umbrella term, contextually speaking it refers to the fact that Jefferson believed in a higher power, a god if that's what you wish to call it, but not Jesus Christ. Through extension, of course, obviously nothing to do with the bible.
It IS incredibly wrong because you don't understand deism and Jefferson.
I'll gladly provide some links to letters of Jefferson denouncing christ if you wish.
Michael Newdow ... ( 3 weeks ago by JordoSkate101)
Michael Newdow couldn't of said it any better.
of coarse, neil ... ( 2 weeks ago by teflonproduction)
of coarse, neil needs to get fired for trying to keep athiest down, when we are the future. i don't really care about the cross, and i don't care what he said about jesus, it's all irrelavant to me. besides he didn't get nominated anyway lol
i think people are ... ( 2 weeks ago by DEMONICSLOTHINDEED)
i think people are seeing what they want or fear to see. has anyone noticed the tree partially covering the "cross" shape which seems more like part of a shelf? notice the objects sitting in one corner of it. hucks position and that of the tree seem to produce a cross. people need to quit looking for controversy in everything and just chill. and not all presidents were christian. especially not Jefferson.
owned, and no- its ... ( 2 weeks ago by 1324123432)
owned, and no- its not worng to appeal to anothers similar likes to gain favor. Similarly, it wouldn't be wrong if I ran for office, someone asked me do I belive in god- and when I said no, they didnt vote for me.
religion is a part of who he is, and thus what we are voting for- why should he not be able to profer what he is?
For those that ... ( 2 weeks ago by Icanonlyguess)
For those that reside in the U.S. and may not know. A campain like this outside the United States (Canada & Europe) would actually hurt the campain. True, stateing a non-belief in God won't help you, there simply is no such statement at all. A message of firm belief will have you come off as a quack.
Yes because ... ( 2 weeks ago by raspberrymuffin)
Yes because religion, any of any kind, should never be used in politics. Religion is a personal life choice, and should not be a part of American politics, as not everyone is Christian. Bringing religion into politics, such as this one, basically says he only is thinking of the Christians, and forget anyone else as their beliefs don't matter.
There shall be no ... ( 1 week ago by TreeRaper)
There shall be no religious test for office...how unclear is that? Newdow was right and he did PWN Cavuto. I'm not against religion I just want it to stop at my government and my rights.
wow wat an argument ... ( 1 week ago by datdude42o)
wow wat an argument newdow didnt prove anything jus got but hurt over an ad. who gives a fuck if a cross is in the background who fukin cares yall jus stupid thats it i didnt get all but hurt when i saw this
yes he did and it ... ( 3 days ago by laxguy22655)
yes he did and it what mikes well ad says is that were a christian nation which we never were infact the founding fathers went out of their way several times to say in various treaties that we were not a christian country we never were and shouldnt be now unfortunately most forget their american history god and all that was not added to the pledge or paper money until the 1950's by good ole ikes' administration



Tell a friend:


URL 
Embed Code