Tango EV Electric Sports Car
Uploaded by: Google
Video Description:
Google Tech Talks
July 18, 2006
ABSTRACT
Before there was the Wrightspeed X-1, there was the Tesla prototype. Before the Tesla, there was the Tango - the first 0-60 in 4 seconds electric sports car that you can actually buy. Credits: Speaker:Rick Woodbury
Tags for this video: car electric google howto sports tango
Find more videos in the "Howto" category
See more videos uploaded by Google
| Commuter Cars' TANGO | I love Electric Vehicles | The Tango Electric car (Part 1) |
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
| The Tango Electric car (Part 2) | Electric Tango (full track) | Electric Tango |
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
Comments for this video: Show || Hide
Tell a friend:














I mean, it's ugly. Until someone invents a cheap electric car with some sex appeal, it won't sell.
Look at the sucess the Tesla Roadster has been already... mind you, that costs loads.
Did they make it **deliberately** ugly? It's as appealing as a chocolate covered meatball.
And surprise surprise (quick check of the Tango website), they're STILL not actually selling it.
Hmmm. Let me see if this seems as odd to you as it does to me:
Aptera: not quite yet, be patient...
Tesla: not quite yet, be patient...
Miles: not quite yet, be patient...
Tango: not quite yet, be patient...
GM Volt: not quite yet, be patient...
Hmmm...
HELP ME!!!
Thank you
Better than Porsche 911 because it doesn't use gas and is just as fast.
Better than the Tesla because it can split lanes.
It would at least solve my own personal energy crisis and traffic jams if it wasn't so expensive to buy.
I applaud their efforts and I hope they go with the truth and offer other designs instead. but I know it's a touch pill to swallow
2. You dont need any lighter, did you notice the performance of the little beast?
3. Efficiency.. Well its probably the most efficient car except for those extremely small solar cell cars they race with.
Its more efficient then Tesla because of weight/power/size and efficiency cant even be mentioned when it comes to cars based on mechanical engines.
Only problem is people dont like small cars, but the few years of oil left will help with that i think..
I know its performance but I also know what cost it comes at energy and cost wise.
weight is good for safety but only against other overweight vehicles. otherwise low weight is fine and we have to think ahead.
if you reduce the weight to 25% you only need 25% of the energy and power to drive it at low speed. the body can be made more aerodynamic too. because of its dependence on a heavy keel it is fundamentally flawed. deal with it.
You complain about wierd things like weight, without that weight it should be limited to 10mph for safety as it would tip over in every corner otherwice.
And the aerodynamic aspect lets just say this: Its half the size so half the air resistance already.
You demand way to mutch from a tiny company building these things in a garage.
Maybe when/if they get mass production you will get your superexpensive version.
I'm going to buy one of these as soon as the price is at his target of $10k each.