ABC News Republican Debate from Iowa - Part 5
Uploaded by: yd2008
Video Description:
http://www.YouDecide2008.com - Candidates Debate Taxes - GOP contenders debate the fairness of the "Fair Tax." 8/5/07
Tags for this video: 2008 abc debate election fair iowa news presidential republican tax taxes
Find more videos in the "News" category
See more videos uploaded by yd2008
Comments for this video: Show || Hide
Tell a friend:














The middle class (and senior citizens living on savings, and churches/religious groups, and not-for-profits, et cetera) would be devastated.
The "Fair" Tax is FAIL.
There is not "23% of embedded taxes*" in the price of everything you buy. Taking the concept as FT fans define it, we see IT IS AN AVERAGE. Some items may have 35% or more in "embedded taxes" while others may have 5%. Thus an imposition of a 23%i/30%e sales tax throws markets for a loop.
*allowing for the concept of "embedded taxes" to be used... others can explain why this is a false idea with respect to the prices of goods
The middle class (and senior citizens living on savings, and churches/religious groups, and not-for-profits, et cetera) would be devastated.
The "Fair" Tax is FAIL.
a table of data by SUPPORTERS of this sales tax.
1)Income for the top decile goes up, the bottom decile goes down.
2)expenditures on the top decile go down, expenditures on the bottom decile goe up.
3) That Table defines the lolFAIL nature of the "research" behind this National Sales Tax idea.
Read their "conclusion" below the table for an extra laugh.
There is not "23% of embedded taxes*" in the price of everything you buy. Taking the concept as FT fans define it, we see IT IS AN AVERAGE. Some items may have 35% or more in "embedded taxes" while others may have 5%. Thus an imposition of a 23%i/30%e sales tax throws markets for a loop.
*allowing for the concept of "embedded taxes" to be used... others can explain why this is a false idea with respect to the prices of goods
It increases the burden of the middle classes and lowers it on the wealthy, according to the FT/NST backers OWN NUMBERS:
From Beacon Hill: Table 9. Average Tax-Inclusive Rates by Income Groups for the FairTax(Replacing Current Income, Payroll, and Estate and Gift Taxes)
by income level deciles:
1 223%
2 30%
3 26%
4 22%
5 20%
6 19%
7 18%
8 19%
9 17%
10 13%
Average 20%
FT/NST backers own data--
From Beacon Hill: Table 9. Average Tax-Inclusive Rates by Income Groups for the FairTax(Replacing Current Income, Payroll, and Estate and Gift Taxes)
by expenditures deciles:
1 25%
2 19%
3 19%
4 19%
5 19%
6 19%
7 19%
8 20%
9 20%
10 (highest) 19%
Average 20%
Since I went to high school with "my" congressman, I wrote him since we had a very rigorous math department at our school, and yet he is listed as a supporter of this "hammer-the-middle-class 'Fair'" Tax on the AFT site.
Not surprisingly, when I got a personal letter back form him, he states that he IS NO LONGER a supporter of the "Fair" Tax.
Math wins again.
"Fair Tax" is FAIL.
tinyurl dotcomslash 593htl
"In the aggregate, some households* would not be as well off for the first couple of years**. However, a stronger incentive to invest and save would cut into consumption, and the greater incentive to work would cut into leisure."
tinyurl 593htl, page 31
*those making $10K-$150K a year
**5-10 years, minimum
Ahhh, sounds great, doesn't it? But again, they are averaging all classes together -- let's look at the true picture:
Real wages of those making $10k-$150K up roughly 0.3 - 3.7%, real wages of those making less than $10k up roughly 13%, while the real wages of those making more than $150K is up nearly 50% (BHI, Table 5).
"Fair" Tax = FAIL.
I strongly disagree with that-- the midclasses don't want to be serfs to a plutocracy.
Shades of "Metropolis"(Lang) and "Soylent Green"...
"Fair" Tax=FAIL
Tables 11 and 9,tinyurl 593htl
and fairtaxorg/BHI, Table 9, tiny 67cyeq
and from CBOgov at
CBO, Table 1A, tinyurl 3gudvf
The "Fair" Tax aka National Sales Tax-inclusive aka "NaSTi" is a very bad idea and would devastate the country.