911 AMATEUR part3

Advertise Here

Search Tags:

Categories:

Advertise Here

911 AMATEUR part3

Uploaded by: heavyplastician
Video Description:
A video analysis of 4 so-called "AMATEUR" shots of "flight 175" hitting WTC2 on 9/11.
THE SHOTS ARE CREDITED TO :
1 : Evan Fairbanks
2 : Luc Courchesne
3 : Michael Hezarkhani
4 : Tina Cart
ANY SERIOUS DEBATE OF THESE SHOTS SHOULD FOCUS ON THE MAIN POINTS I BRING UP HERE FOR EACH ONE OF THEM, IN ORDER NOT TO DILUTE THE DEBATE IN MINOR CONSIDERATIONS :
SHOT 1 : Fairbanks' video has many oddities. Yet, THE MAIN one is that the airplane melts into the tower with NOTHING - not even the aft assembly - breaking off.
SHOTS 2 & 3 : Both these shots show, on 'plane' impact, two explosions on the tower (over and under right wingtip). If these are not shape charges planted in the tower, WHAT are they ?
SHOT 4 : The lines (or rings) on the World Trade Centers are extremely bright - even though they are in shade. This ALONE makes this picture a fake.
Also, if you want more info on how the 9/11 TV fakery was carried out, please watch:
SEPTEMBER CLUES (part1-8)
http://www.livevideo.com/socialservice

Tags for this video: 9/11 911 bush fairbanks fakery giuliani no planes tv wtc2

Find more videos in the "Education" category
See more videos uploaded by heavyplastician

Related Videos

How NOT to Fake Plane Crash Videos - TinaCart1	Rare Amateur 911 Videos	The Flying Elephant: Evidence for Involvement of a Third Jet

September Clues Pt.1	911 AMATEUR part2	911tvf wq2rx girl sexy myspace sex girl amateur 911 ...

Share This Video:

Comments for this video: Show || Hide

Comments for this video on YouTube

Dude, did you do ... ( 3 months ago by klonedklein)

Dude, did you do the pent and penn too? not long enough on this... I am sure you could have expanded. Me? I don't believe anything from the govs mouths and all this 9/11 stuff, imo, is meant to confuse and keep our attention while they continue passing laws and BS like Codex and shit.
thanks for well done vid.

I know this: I was ... ( 3 months ago by randallcaster)

I know this: I was duobter of "no plane' now I'm not. I'll change MY views, where the facts lead me.

Crazy world we're ... ( 3 months ago by heavyplastician)

Crazy world we're on eh? Have you seen the new September Clues? youtubeDOTcom/profile_videos?user=simonshack

Yeah, the Codex ... ( 3 months ago by heavyplastician)

Yeah, the Codex sucks bigtime! I didn't do this vid, just mirroring! Have you seen the new September Clues?
youtubeDOTcom/profile_videos?user=simonshack

Also check out the ... ( 3 months ago by heavyplastician)

Also check out the new September Clues!
youtubeDOTcom/profile_videos?user=simonshack

A question... at 4: ... ( 3 months ago by germanpilot999)

A question... at 4:45, this is a car antenna, isn´t it?

I'm not sure about ... ( 3 months ago by heavyplastician)

I'm not sure about that, at 4:11 it looks like it's next to the car. If it was attached to the car it's all the way to the front of the car.(If the camera faces the front that is) Strange place to put an antenna! I don't know why the maker of this video (not me) pointed out the alleged antenna in the first place, but now you point this out I'll have to think about that.

What were the pink ... ( 2 months ago by investur)

What were the pink and yellow arrows referring to at 7:24 of your video?
There is a link that's excellent for facilitating clearer thinking on this issue, message me if you want it, I have to dig it out.
For me, Bush's first lie about seeing the first crash nailed it for me.
Planes can't fly that fast at that altitude and EVEN if they could, they could not hit a target. Note the 2nd half of my sentence was superfluous and thus misleading.
Where's the effect of the turbulence after impact?

Ive seen the whole ... ( 2 months ago by liljont08)

Ive seen the whole video from the first camera and that "High piece of technology" is a radio sitting on the hood of the car which is why there is a reflection of the stuff happening so the first part is all wrong and trying to make us think the "Amateurs" were in on it.
I think there is something fishy about 9/11 but i do not think that these ppl are just ppl taking shots and getting LUCKY!

OMG, I have never ... ( 2 months ago by Maralyssa)

OMG, I have never seen this before. This is one hell of a video. Thank you for sharing.

you cant use same ... ( 1 month ago by intoxicologist)

you cant use same 35mm film footage analysis techniques on digital images. digital photography is well known for having problems rendering images during high speed panning in high contrast light changing environments. as a cameraman it does not surprise me one bit that the wing appears and dissappears momentarily.

remember in a ... ( 1 month ago by intoxicologist)

remember in a digital camera what you see is not a reflection of the reality, it is a compressed calculation made by a collection of minute electronic sensors on a cmos. if you dont understand that then you should be analysing digital film footage. and anyway it is also perfectly normal to put a video camera on the ground and look through the adjustable viewfinder.dont have to be a dwarf.viewfinders on pro digi cameras are superb aswell, they have to be. have you ever used one?

Array ( 1 month ago by INSPECTOR19741)

good job bush ¡¡¡
the war is your business.

its funny to see ... ( 1 month ago by PWNSTAA)

its funny to see how hard people try to debunk 911. i was in manhattan at that time and witnessed the 2nd hit. i didnt have a camera, i had an even better tool, my eyes.

You didn't see any ... ( 3 weeks ago by ImyManz99)

You didn't see any planes hit, chump.

actually i did my ... ( 3 weeks ago by PWNSTAA)

actually i did my friend

What you saw wasn't ... ( 3 weeks ago by ImyManz99)

What you saw wasn't flight 175.

first of all, why ... ( 3 weeks ago by PWNSTAA)

first of all, why do you assume you know wat i saw? i dont know the number of the plane, i wasnt worried about that. but for all these people who say a plane never hit, they are wrong

may us televisions ... ( 3 weeks ago by andrearania)

may us televisions need learning how to mask with after effect... good job for who did this video

I've seen this Evan ... ( 2 weeks ago by freedomfan0801)

I've seen this Evan Fairbanks video several times and I've never noticed this little view along the bottom. Kinda makes me wonder what the hell it is. And I've seen the dissapearing wing thing before. Always wondered about that too.

okay.. if it wasn't ... ( 6 days ago by Quertyu)

okay.. if it wasn't a plane that hit the twin-toweres, what about the people who "were" in the planes.. what happened to them?

Array ( 6 days ago by SirBroadsword)

PWNSTAA:
Actually, it is YOU who assumes you know what YOU saw... There are missile types with VERY similar

silhouettes to a ... ( 6 days ago by SirBroadsword)

silhouettes to a jet liner and could easily be painted up to look like one... What you saw couldn't have lasted more than a few seconds, which is not enough time for most people to think "that's too small to be a jetliner", except perhaps for the woman who screamed "that was not an American Airlines!"...
Not to mention that you've been bombarded with "it was a plane" over and over again for the last eight years... The power of suggestion is a strong force...

LoL... 3:16 ... ( 3 days ago by DjHardJ)

LoL... 3:16 windshield 4:44 Antenna the guy is leanning up against a car!!... but that footage is rather strange... wtf whats that guy doing (cameraman) getting and angle like that... wouldent buildings have blocked his veiw of the approtching "jet"? how would he have known about its approtch and just whip his camera out and start filming... that shot was like 1/1,000,000,00... strange

Tell a friend:

WebcamSearch Videos

Video Sharing Community

911 AMATEUR part3

URL
Embed Code