Advertise Here

Milton Friedman on Slavery and Colonization



Uploaded by: Sidewinder77
Video Description:
This clip is from the 15-part lecture series, "Milton Friedman Speaks" http://www.ideachannel.com/product_info.php?products_id=1137
Transcript available via FreedomChannel: http://freedomchannel.blogspot.com/2007/12/milton-friedman-on-slavery.html
Summary:
A student poses a question to Milton Friedman in which he asks for an appraisal of just how exactly the riches that now exist in the so called "capitalist democracies" were obtained and how those countries became so rich so quick. Specifically he asks Friedman to account for the effect that having free labor derived from slavery allowed them to enrich themselves, and how the possession of colonies allowed rich countries to bleed wealth out of their colonial domains.
Friedman responds by claiming it's simply untrue that the wealth that arose in Western countries was due to slavery. Slavery was a disgrace and a blot on the United States' record, but many rich Western nations did not have slavery. Britain and Japan did not have slaves when they developed and Hong Kong does not have slaves today.
He goes onto claim that the facts are against the notion that the wealth was created due to the West exploiting its colonies. The reason people are quick to think so is that they have an ingrained predisposition to see view the world as a zero-sum game where if one man gains the other man looses. In reality a free market allows everyone to gain through mutually beneficial voluntary transactions. When the West colonized Africa they brought with them technology that greatly improved the condition of the people that lived there and actually made them better off. The wheel for example had not even been invented in Africa in the 19th century. As a result of Africa's contacts with the West their condition improved greatly from what it previously was.
To the charge that colonizers bleed wealth from their colonies, Friedman notes that it has always cost the mother country more to maintain its colonies then what was ever received in direct or indirect economic benefit. In the famous case of India, conclusive studies have shown that it cost Britain far more to maintain India then if it had never had it. Furthermore, many Western nations never possessed colonies yet became wealthy despite that fact.
See also:
Free to Choose - All 15 episodes streaming online for free
http://www.ideachannel.tv
A history of Free to Choose
http://www.freetochoose.com


Tags for this video: Africa Capitalism Colonialization communism documentary economics Freedom Friedman liberty Milton Slavery socialism

Find more videos in the "News" category
See more videos uploaded by Sidewinder77

Related Videos
Milton Friedman on Self-Interest and the Profit Motive 1of2Milton Friedman on Libertarianism (Part 1 of 4)Milton Friedman: The Purpose of the Federal Reserve
milton-friedman-on-selfinterest-and-the-profit-motive-1of2.htmlmilton-friedman-on-selfinterest-and-the-profit-motive-1of2.htmlmilton-friedman-on-selfinterest-and-the-profit-motive-1of2.html
Economics 102 - Keynes v FriedmanThe 4 Ways to Spend Money by Milton FriedmanMilton Friedman Debates Naomi Klein Part 2
milton-friedman-on-selfinterest-and-the-profit-motive-1of2.htmlmilton-friedman-on-selfinterest-and-the-profit-motive-1of2.htmlmilton-friedman-on-selfinterest-and-the-profit-motive-1of2.html


Share This Video:       StumbleUpon       del.icio.us       Reddit       digg       Furl       Spurl       Simpy       YahooMyWeb


Comments for this video: Show || Hide
Comments for this video on YouTube
What is that thing ... ( 4 weeks ago by ThePissedOffAtheist)
What is that thing at the start?
The fact alone that ... ( 3 weeks ago by sharpdrpaul)
The fact alone that Friedman can sit there with absolutely no shred of irony and state that slavery and colonisation was actually an economic detriment to the imperial powers engaging them, is enough reason to question this man's veracity or puported concern for the outcomes of the policy he has propagated that has benefitted so few and harmed so very many.
you're a fool ( 3 weeks ago by dannidandannikins)
you're a fool
He did not argue ... ( 2 weeks ago by milfhuntergk)
He did not argue that slavery was a detriment to the imperial powers. He argued that the Imperial powers did not prosper soley out of slavery. Moreover, the policies he progated have done more than ANY other organization of resources to pull people OUT of the slums than any other. Name ONE system that has done more...
Competitive Capitalism: the worst system, except all the others.
I second it, You're a fool.
Wise man. I really ... ( 1 week ago by remilonoy)
Wise man. I really enjoyed watching this video.
That is right, ... ( 1 week ago by MetaMorphy)
That is right, sharpdrpaul---snap. You are so much smarter than Milton Friedman; you are such a fucking genius. I mean, there is no way this Nobel prize winner could know what he was talking about. Go back to school. Militarism is never profitable. That is a basic truism of economic science. It is unprofitable for the same reason crime is unprofitable.
No way. China was ... ( 1 week ago by MetaMorphy)
No way. China was more protectionist than Japan. Also, you are making a post-hoc conclusion. Most countries are engaged in some form of protectionism most of the time. However, Japan became far less protectionist under the Meiji restoration than it had been before. Think of it this way, if all you do is export and never import, aren't you giving your stuff away and getting nothing but inflation in return. Hong Kong also was very much not protectionistic; esp. in comparison to China.
That is a man. ( 1 week ago by derner22)
That is a man.
You mean an ... ( 1 week ago by ThePissedOffAtheist)
You mean an eartling? Sure fooled me!
I wonder if any ... ( 1 week ago by ThePissedOffAtheist)
I wonder if any lefty would care to discuss the issue of all the Europeans taken as slaves by Barbary pirates of the Ottoman empire, the Mafia-like tribute money European countries paid to Muslims states who were in cahoots with the pirates and the enslavement of ½ the Muslim population in Islamic theocracies and enslavement of non-Muslims in some Muslim occupied African countries even today?
Not to mention the ... ( 1 week ago by ThePissedOffAtheist)
Not to mention the fact that the African slave trade was run by Muslims and European and American slave traders bought from Muslims (we didn't colonize Africa and steal it's people, the Muslims did that for us). And what about the political ideology that may as well be called organized slavery, communism? Will any arrogant, pro-Islam, anti-Western lefties here care to discuss these issues?
Capitalism is a " ... ( 6 days ago by Rakeatthegatesofhell)
Capitalism is a "necessary condition for freedom?!" Is he serious? Sure, it worked wonderfully for the industrialists under Hitler; Pinochet's reign was a golden era of liberty; and the Bush years will be an inspiration to the world for aeons. Capitalism is an abysmal failure for the masses; a system which dehumanizes and debases. It is a festering sore on the face of the world. May I live to see its demise. Like war, capitalism is an idea whose time has passed.
Necessary, but not ... ( 6 days ago by ThePissedOffAtheist)
Necessary, but not sufficient. Nobody has ever said that capitalism leads to civil freedom by default (including Friedman) although it almost always does given enough time - look at 21st century Chile. It's like secularism: it's a necessary though insufficient condition for a free country. A theocracy is a totalitarian police state by default and all free countries have a secular society or government or both.
So you hope you ... ( 5 days ago by trevmax7)
So you hope you live to see a day when you wake up and your job, your money, and your decisions are all controlled by the government? This doesn't seem like the ideal dream to me.
Slavery and ... ( 4 days ago by CosmicFork)
Slavery and Capitalism were inextricably linked. It's a Highly Profitable Enterprise to steal a person's labor for an entire lifetime,... then steal the labor from that person's child, and so on, and so on. Capitalism drove the huge Corporate Plantations in the antebellum South, and one of the goals of "Gen Sherman's march to the sea" in The Civil War, was to destroy all that ill-gotten gain, all that wealth stolen from the slaves labor. The conservatives never talk about that!
I don't believe the ... ( 4 days ago by Spalg)
I don't believe the south ever had a free market
In a true ... ( 4 days ago by dudeman209)
In a true capitalist/free world, slavery would never have existed. Government allowed slavery to exist, not the free market. In a free society, each individual would choose for how much he/she could sell his/her labor for. Not one person would sell their labor for nothing. Government is the institution that allowed slavery to go on, not the free market.
I agree!What´s ... ( 2 days ago by franz9z)
I agree!What´s wrong with slavery?I also think Murray Rothbard haved defended it if he only have lived to day.
Slavery is ... ( 2 days ago by dudeman209)
Slavery is absolutely despicable and I hate every aspect of it, but my point is that it is government that is to blame for slavery. I haven't read any Rothbard so I can't really speak about him, but I do know that Milton Friedman hated slavery and even viewed the draft as a form of it(which it is). Capitalism is based on the idea of voluntary cooperation. Slavery is just one person telling others what to do all the time, which takes away freedom. Capitalism and Freedom can only exist together.
What freedom exists ... ( 1 day ago by titowasagoodman1980)
What freedom exists under capitalism? The only freedom that exists in this system is the freedom to buy and sell. You don't set the parameters of any aspect of the system-people tend to treat the existing order as absolute and transcendent. True economic power lies in deciding WHAT NEEDS TO BE PRODUCED, HOW TO PRODUCE IT AND HOW TO DISTRIBUTE IT.
Key to this concept is democracy PEOPLE MUST CHOOSE!
If anyone wants to continue
BRING IT ON MOTHERFUCKERS!!
I recommend "Henry ... ( 1 day ago by JMartins1981)
I recommend "Henry Hazlitt -- Economics In One Lesson". It's been made avaliable on the web, for free.
The freedom in the ... ( 1 day ago by titowasagoodman1980)
The freedom in the socialist/communist/paricon systems comes in the fact that people decide what to produce, how to acquire and consume based on what they need or see necessary. They don't let "THE MARKET", which is abstract, decide that for them. I'm not in favor of soviet style communism-but if you are able to choose your leaders you should decide upon these things as well! I like socialism because it bases itself on people, not some abstract measure of value and it's relation to them.
Your just one of ... ( 21 hours ago by franz9z)
Your just one of this Friedman-Kutnez Moneratist Commies!Lot of Blah-Blah!Read Murray Rothbard instead of listen to that "street-smart" Brooklyn guy Friedman!
Murray Rothbard ... ( 1 hour ago by franz9z)
Murray Rothbard wrote:"In fact, in this as in other such cases, suspicion is precisely the right response for the libertarian, for Professor Friedmans particular brand of "free-market economics" is hardly calculated to ruffle the feathers of the powers-that-be. Milton Friedman is the Establishments Court Libertarian, and it is high time that libertarians awaken to this fact of life."



Tell a friend:


URL 
Embed Code 


Advertise Here