Search Tags:

Categories:

Punisher 1989 Witty Comments



Uploaded by: Bluebird0020
Video Description:
Just a bunch of witty comments from the 1989 Punisher Movie. I don't own Punisher, and if I did, I'd Punish whoever casted Dolph Lundgren to play him in this film


Tags for this video: 1989 Comment Dolph Lundgren Punisher The Witty

Find more videos in the "Entertainment" category
See more videos uploaded by Bluebird0020

Related Videos
Scene from "The Punisher" (1989)The Punisher 1989Punisher (1989) - "Bodies"
scene-from-the-punisher-1989.htmlscene-from-the-punisher-1989.htmlscene-from-the-punisher-1989.html
The Punisher (1989) rare parody Trailer w Dolph Lundgren !The Punisher(1989)The Punisher 1989 (La Original)
scene-from-the-punisher-1989.htmlscene-from-the-punisher-1989.htmlscene-from-the-punisher-1989.html


Share This Video:       StumbleUpon       del.icio.us       Reddit       digg       Furl       Spurl       Simpy       YahooMyWeb


Comments for this video: Show || Hide
Comments for this video on YouTube
But yeah, Chris. ... ( 4 months ago by Bluebird0020)
But yeah, Chris. Sometimes, I think you and I just may be the only ones who still read the comics instead of just catching the movies, because if the rest of these people had ever even glanced at a comic book, they'd know Jane was better than the emo Punisher.
Heh. Dude, you have ... ( 4 months ago by Hyperkid37)
Heh. Dude, you have NO IDEA how many times I hear people whine about comic book movies, Spider-Man 3 most recently, and when they start ripping into it, I simply reply 'Have you ever even read the comic book?' A crying shame too.
My only problem ... ( 4 months ago by Bluebird0020)
My only problem with Spidey 3 was Venom. He's my favorite Spiderman villian, so maybe that's why I'm a bit harsh on the way they had him, but...seriously. He had about a scene and a half, and they never even said his name in the movie. I wish they would've left off Eddie Brock after the part of him getting taken over by the symbiote. Finished off Sandman, and saved Venom for the next movie. That was my only real problem with it.
Yeah. That's what ... ( 4 months ago by Hyperkid37)
Yeah. That's what most people thought. Course, at least Venom had a name in advertising. I'd rather be no named in the movie then be dubbed 'New Goblin'. What, is it like New Coke now? Get New Venom and New Sandman in Spider-Man 4?
Good point. I have ... ( 4 months ago by Bluebird0020)
Good point. I have no idea where they pulled the "New Goblin" from. I just kinda imagine them sitting in a circle and picking names out of a hat.
"Okay, okay! We got New Goblin. But just to see if we had caught something else..." Then they reach back in there and grab another one, "Oooh, The Gobster...that would have been nice..."
I disagree. The ... ( 3 months ago by TotalitarianHypnosis)
I disagree. The skull in the comics is completely acceptable - however, putting a skull on a t-shirt for a live action movie kind of adds a childish scheme to the whole gritty and merciless portrayal. The 2004 version was absolutely deplorable and a large insult to me. I've been reading the Punisher comics for a very long time, and the movie was just another one of those time a dozen, shit blows up, people die action movies with the Marvel logo.
I'm not too much of ... ( 3 months ago by TotalitarianHypnosis)
I'm not too much of a stickler for comic book accuracy in a film adaptation as long as it does not stray too far away from the original plot. I feel both Punisher films were misinterpretations of the comics. While the 2004 filmed focused a bit on the Marvel Knights series - it was completely corny! Cars blowing up in the shape of the Punisher skull? Gimme a break.
You obviously have ... ( 3 months ago by Bluebird0020)
You obviously have a really educated perspective, and aren't another of those idiots saying the Dolph movie was better, when they have no comic book background whatsoever. Personally as far as comic accuracy goes, I think that's the most important thing. Because if you're not going to make it accurate to the source material, then you might as well just change the name of the movie and make it into something else if it doesn't respect the source material.
As far as it being ... ( 3 months ago by Bluebird0020)
As far as it being corny, I can kinda see where you're coming from, but I have to disagree. Again, the skull goes back to the whole comic accuracy thing. If you're not comic accurate...then...you might as well be Tim Burton. The only thing they changed was the reason he wore the skull. In the comics, it was so people would instinctively shoot at it when he walked in the room, drawing fire towards his heavily armored body, rather than his bare head. In the movie, it was because of his kid.
having not seen ... ( 3 months ago by stoth007)
having not seen this movie since the 90's, i watched it again recently. I gotta say it really stands up on its own. dolph's one liners make this movie better than it already is. Actually refreshing to see 80's/early 90's movies when directors made movies with the style they interpreted, in constrast to today where in many cases films are toned down to fit into pg13 ratings to make more money.
una pelicula muy ... ( 2 months ago by anelenabalab)
una pelicula muy buena
I believe the 2004 ... ( 2 months ago by Ieat6pies)
I believe the 2004 was more marvel Knights too, but this seems more far away from the comics...the other one is a little more torwrd the comics
I wish they would ... ( 2 months ago by averagejoesgym71)
I wish they would have brought Dolph back for the newest Punisher
How you can say ... ( 2 months ago by Bluebird0020)
How you can say that and sleep at night is beyond me.
I could not agree ... ( 2 months ago by cheapseats12)
I could not agree more bluebird!
What??? Is it ... ( 2 months ago by Bluebird0020)
What??? Is it possible??
Somebody here has sanity???
If I knew you, I'd give you the tightest and most completely heterosexual hug you've ever had.
Unless of course you're a chick, which would be preferable. But regardless, to know Dolph Lundgren was NOT the Punisher is good news either way.
In my opinion the ... ( 1 month ago by LOPAN42069)
In my opinion the 2004 punisher is an even worse adaption. First of all how do you have a punisher movie in Miami his family was killed in Central Park for gods sake. They had him pussy footing around that entire movie moving fire hydrants and taking pictures of gay criminals trying to frame people. The punisher from the comics never beet around the bush and neither did the 89 punisher . I know the 2004 punisher was an origin story but the problem was it wasn't his.
You shut your ... ( 1 month ago by IGOTDOWNS)
You shut your filthy mouth. Dolph Lundgren is super hardcore!
..........Thats ... ( 1 month ago by cheapseats12)
..........Thats awesome!
Dolph was a great ... ( 4 weeks ago by ivaxnorris)
Dolph was a great Punisher, it must be saying something if you're one of the few who didn't like his acting.
did he just ... ( 3 weeks ago by brandonnie382)
did he just threaten to kill a 10 year old?! lol awsum i wanna see this so bad.
Have you ever even ... ( 3 weeks ago by Bluebird0020)
Have you ever even read a comic? He was nothing like the role he was attempting to portray.
Well actualy it was ... ( 3 weeks ago by crintfish101)
Well actualy it was Tampa which is still in Florida but no where near Miami. Ill let u off for tht. The 2004 adaption was great but u are right about it being a bit of balls up on the comic stories. This film looks pretty good but i dont believe this Dolph guy as the punisher. He looks enough like him but he sounds like a stoner puff. He might as well be the 10 year old boy. I just hope they make a decent punisher film in New York.
and he was an fbi ... ( 4 days ago by docholliday8959)
and he was an fbi agent or some shit like that and wasnt he originally a vietnam special forces? maybe the new one will be better



Tell a friend:


URL 
Embed Code