Advertise Here
Dawkins vs. Tyson
Uploaded by: agillesp123
Video Description:
At the 'Beyond Belief' discussion, Tyson rebukes Dawkins for his rhetorical style, and Dawkins responds brilliantly.
Tags for this video: Advocacy Dawkins deGrasse Neal Science Tyson
Find more videos in the "Howto" category
See more videos uploaded by agillesp123
Comments for this video: Show || Hide
Tell a friend:














So your point about RNA is a different topic and a different issue of debate.
I am not concerned about programing theory, I am talking about empirical observation at sub atomic scales.
The universe is probalistic, you do not have to like, or even agree, but it will not change what has been repeatedly observed.
I encourage you to actually investigate as I suggested.
Scientist have demonstrated in the laboratory that the early conditions that would have been found on earth greatly increase the probability of the natural formation of complex self replicating proteins, evolution does not address how life came to exist science is still struggling to understand.
If life was created by god, it seems odd that he would plant all the bogus evidence found in the scientific study of nature. I can not say if god exists, but I can say that from what we know of the universe the gods discribed by many theistic philosophies are highly improbable and need to be revised or dismissed.
This indicates your lack of education regarding the subject, evolution has many observed predictions empirically demonstrated. Your all or nothing attitude about science is fallacious.
I thought you understood what evolution theory is, we can not debate the subject if you lack this knowledge.
Evolution has had huge impact in the medical field in the insight it offers, and its reach has is not limited to this field.
Evolution is also critical in agriculture.
The study of genetics is born from the insights of this theory.
You may not like what evolution implies about scriptural creation, but it is naive to suggest it has not benefited humanity.
I for one am not satisfied by "god did it" this explains nothing and does not offer practical use, only convenience for the philosophically lazy and psychological comfort for those that can not deal with epistemological ambiguity. Science is the study of what religions claim is gods creation, yet it is rejected if it conflicts with prior assumptions of those religions.
You atheist are a bunch of crying , complaining, and the most ungrateful group of people in this country. It was theist who gave you all the rights you now abuse.
You never thank us for the good and u never use facts
religious beliefs survive given leisure
activities relate to fictions e.g. reading fiction , watching T.V., soaps, phantasising about our past, future , questioning the purpose, if any, of our existence and phenomena scientists cannot explain.
buddh1stsaga1nstre1ncarnat1on fullstopc0m
Well may he ask himself, "Wil these godless persecutors never stop persecuting our persecutors?"